Many foreign companies facing breach of contract, default or commercial disputes have to deal with litigation in Thailand. Thailand remains one of the leading destinations for international investment in Southeast Asia. An open economy, stable banking system and free economic zones make the country attractive to foreign companies. But effective operations are impossible without a deep understanding of how Thailand's legal procedures function, especially in the area of conflict resolution. It is the judicial mechanisms that often become the final authority in disputes between partners, contractors or government agencies.
Litigation in Thailand has unique features that differ from the practice of common law and civil law countries. Special attention is required when participating in commercial disputes where one of the parties is a foreign legal entity. In such cases, it is important to take into account the specifics of filing a claim, the stages of the preliminary hearing, the rules for serving a summons, and, of course, the requirements for representation in court. Mistakes at the initial stage, including initiating a claim in Thailand without following local procedures, can lead to delays in the case or its rejection.
This material is prepared for entrepreneurs planning to do business in the kingdom or who have already faced the need to initiate legal proceedings in Thailand. The article examines the key stages of a dispute : from the disclosure of evidence to the issuance of a court decision and possible appeal of the decision. It also touches on the topics of alternative dispute resolution, the role of arbitration and the practice of enforcing court decisions. The text is written based on an analysis of regulations, judicial practice and real experience of conducting commercial cases in the courts of Thailand.
General structure of the judicial system in Thailand
Court procedures in Thailand are conducted inside a centralized framework based on a pecking order of courts. Each sort of court has its claim procedural work. Understanding the structure permits you to start a claim in Thailand accurately, maintain a strategic distance from botches when recording a claim, and construct an apt legitimate strategy.
Three-tier equity system
The courts of to begin with occurrence in Thailand listen to the bulk of debate: criminal, respectful, family, labor and commercial. The choice of court depends on the nature of the strife and the status of the parties. It is in these courts that legitimate procedures in Thailand most regularly start, counting cases including outside companies.
In case of difference with the choice, a request to the Thai court is conceivable, which checks to what degree the conclusions of the lower occasion comply with the law. A re-evaluation of the realities is not carried out. The complaint is recorded with the re-appraising courts of Thailand inside entirely built up procedural due dates, infringement of which leads to its rejection.
At the best of the framework is the Incomparable Court of Thailand (Dika Court). Its assignment is to control the uniform application of the law. Here, solely questions of law are considered. At this level, the precision of contentions, the rectified introduction of proof in Thailand, and compliance with all strategies are particularly important.
Specialized courts
In expansion to the common ward, there are specialized courts in Thailand made for cases requiring extraordinary arrangement. The Central Insolvency Court listens to bankruptcy and obligation rebuilding cases. Companies included in speculation debate in Thailand frequently confront its jurisdiction.
The Intellectual Property and Worldwide Exchange Court settle debate related to copyright, trademarks, and remote exchange exchanges. The Labor Court of Thailand listens to debates between managers and representatives. The Regulatory Court handles debate with government organizations, counting authorizing, assess, and traditions issues.
Which court listens commercial debate in Thailand
Conducting lawful procedures in Thailand requires an exact understanding of which court to apply to in each particular case. A blunder in choosing a ward can lead to the claim being returned or time being squandered. To open a case in a Thai court, it is vital to begin with deciding locale based on three criteria: regional, subject matter, and cost.
Determination of the suitable court
Territorially, the debate is considered in the court at the out of enlistment of the litigant, the pit of execution of the commitment or the put of event of the harm. This is the key reference point when recording a claim in Thailand.
Subject matter locale depends on the nature of the struggle. Contract debate are respectful procedures, assess claims are subject to the regulatory court, obvious and trademark debate are the purview of the Mental Property Court of Thailand. Mistakes in deciding the subject matter will result in the claim being returned without consideration.
The taken a toll model is utilized to decide the level of occasion. Claims up to a certain sum are considered without the right of offer. Surpassing the limit opens the way to offer the court choice in Thailand and influences the composition of the court, the prerequisites for proof and the structure of procedural reports. This is why it is critical to precisely decide the sum of claims and accurately calculate the locale at the planning organization.
Table: Basic threshold values
|
Amount of claim (in Thai Baht) |
Judicial authority |
Peculiarities |
|
Up to 300,000 baht |
Municipal Court |
Hears minor claims. The decision is often final, without appeal. |
|
From 300,001 to 2,000,000 baht |
Provincial Court |
Appeals are allowed. Most cases are heard by a single judge. |
|
Over 2,000,000 baht |
Provincial Court (enlarged composition) |
The case is considered by a panel of judges. An appeal to the appellate court is mandatory. |
Stages of the trial in Thailand
Conducting legal proceedings in Thailand is impossible without understanding how the dispute resolution mechanism is structured. The procedure consists of successive stages, each of which is regulated by the rules of Thai procedural law. Skipping or violating one of the links can lead to the rejection of the claim, loss of the right to defense or an increase in legal costs. This is especially true when participating in commercial disputes in Thailand, where not only the legal position is important, but also strict adherence to procedural regulations.
The process begins with the initiation of a claim in Thailand, drawn up in the form of an official application. The document is filed in the courts of first instance at the place determined by the rules of territorial jurisdiction. At the same time, all formal conditions must be met - from certification of powers of attorney to translation of appendices into Thai. Mistakes at this stage complicate subsequent representation in court. After accepting the application, the court sends a summons in Thailand to the defendant, from which the period for objecting to the claim begins to count.
The next stage is the preliminary court hearing in Thailand. It serves as a filter for the formal assessment of the claim. The court checks the existence of procedural grounds, compliance with the filing rules, and the powers of the parties. Here, the basic issues on the merits of the dispute can also be determined. Sometimes the parties come to a partial agreement. If the grounds are deemed sufficient, the court proceeds to the active phase - consideration of the case on the merits.
Evidence collection begins in Thailand. Each party is required to present materials supporting their arguments. In practice, the principle of disclosure of evidence is used, which provides for the provision of copies of documents to the other party. The factual basis is built not only on written sources, but also on expert opinions, witness testimony and other acceptable methods of proof. The exact list depends on the specifics of the conflict and the subject of the dispute.
The substantive hearings are the main trial in Thailand. At this stage, the parties' positions are heard, witnesses are questioned, and written materials are read out. The court may ask questions directly and interrupt the presentation of arguments if they go beyond the subject of the dispute. The stage ends with judicial debates in Thailand, where the parties formulate their final positions. It is at this stage that the legal assessment of the case is formed.
After the hearing is over, the court goes into deliberation. The result is a court decision in Thailand, drawn up in writing. The document contains the legal qualification of the facts and the legislation applied. If one of the parties is not satisfied with the decision, it is possible to appeal the decision.
The right to appeal to a Thai court is granted within a specified period. Appellate courts consider the case on the basis of the materials already presented, without re-examining the factual side. Sometimes the decision can be transferred to the Supreme Court if there are grounds for cassation. This requires separate preparation and most often concerns violations in the application of Thai law.
Timing and duration of the process
Trials in Thailand in civil cases can last from one to two years or more, especially if the parties actively use all procedural means. In criminal proceedings the terms are shorter, especially if the accused is in custody. But even in civil cases it is possible to speed up by coordinating the schedule of hearings and minimizing breaks between stages.
Peculiarities of participation of a foreign company in a court proceeding
Conducting legal proceedings in Thailand on the part of a foreign company requires careful preparation and adaptation to the country's legal system. Thai jurisdiction imposes strict requirements on the procedural status of non-residents. Lack of knowledge of local regulations can lead to even a well-founded claim being rejected at the stage of formal verification.
The law does not allow a foreign legal entity to participate in a case without the involvement of a local representative. A mandatory condition is representation in a Thai court through a lawyer licensed in the Kingdom. Foreign specialists do not have the right to appear in court. Even if the company has a legal department, the dispute is managed only through a Thai attorney. This rule applies both in the courts of first instance in Thailand and when filing complaints in the appellate courts of Thailand.
The package of documents submitted on behalf of the foreign party must be prepared in accordance with the requirements of legal procedures in Thailand. All foreign acts, contracts, powers of attorney and corporate extracts are subject to mandatory certification. In practice, an apostille or consular legalization is used, depending on the country of origin of the document. After this, an official translation into Thai is required. The translation must be certified and accepted in the proceedings by the relevant authority. In the absence of such registration, the court has the right to refuse to accept the materials.
Court proceedings in Thailand are conducted exclusively in Thai. The participation of a foreign party requires the mandatory involvement of a certified interpreter. The court does not provide such a specialist; the party invites him independently. The interpreter must have official status and experience in court. His participation is necessary at all stages: from the preliminary court hearing in Thailand to the court's decision. Without the accompaniment of an interpreter, the meaning of the arguments may be distorted and the right to defense may be violated.
Physical presence in the country is not a mandatory requirement. The law allows for opening a case in a Thai court and conducting the trial through a proxy. In this case, legal protection is provided on the basis of an official power of attorney, drawn up in accordance with the requirements of the plaintiff's country and legalized in Thailand. This solution reduces costs and allows the company to focus on its core business, delegating dispute management to a local law firm.
Alternative: Arbitration and Mediation
Litigation in Thailand is not always the best way to protect a company's interests. Despite the formal strictness and hierarchy of the judicial system, the usual judicial route can be protracted, costly and subject to procedural risks. This is especially true for complex commercial disputes in Thailand with a cross-border element, when the parties speak different languages, apply different legal systems and have different business cultures. In such situations, arbitration and mediation are reasonable alternatives - ways to resolve a conflict without resorting to state court.
Arbitration as a tool for commercial protection
Arbitration in Thailand is particularly effective in resolving disputes arising from international contracts. It allows one to bypass the usual court proceedings and refer the case to an arbitration body competent in the commercial sphere. In Thai jurisdiction, there is the Arbitration Centre of the Chamber of Commerce of Thailand, which considers both domestic and transnational cases. The consideration takes place in English or Thai, depending on the terms of the contract. In this case, the parties can choose the arbitrators, determine the procedural rules and the place of hearing.
The main advantage is confidentiality and flexibility. Arbitration allows avoiding public disclosure of corporate information. The decision rendered by arbitration has the same binding force as a decision of a state court. If necessary, it can be enforced if one of the parties refuses to comply with it voluntarily.
Mediation as a way to settle disputes before going to court
An alternative to both court and arbitration is mediation in Thailand. This method is voluntary and involves the participation of a neutral mediator. It helps the parties to reach a mutually acceptable solution before or during the proceedings. Mediation can be conducted both privately and with the support of the court. In some cases, it precedes a preliminary court hearing in Thailand, especially if the case is subject to settlement without judicial intervention.
The advantage is saving time and resources. Mediation does not require procedural formalities and does not impose obligations before an agreement is reached. If an agreement is reached, it is recorded in writing and can be submitted to the court for enforcement. In case of failure, the parties retain the right to file a lawsuit in Thailand or initiate arbitration.
For businesses, mediation allows them to maintain partnerships, avoid a negative image, and focus on continuing their operations. That is why alternative dispute resolution in Thailand is becoming increasingly important in the strategy for protecting the interests of companies operating in this market.
Enforcement of Court Decisions: How to Get Money
In conditions when Conducting legal proceedings in Thailand requires significant resources, reaching a final decision does not always mean real restoration of the violated right. For businesses, it is not the fact of victory itself that is critical, but the ability to achieve the execution of the court decision and collect the amounts due. This stage is often left outside the scope of legal planning, although it determines the economic effect of the entire proceedings.
Mechanisms for the execution of judicial decisions
After the court decision in Thailand is made and comes into legal force, the enforcement stage begins. The law requires obtaining a special document - a writ of execution of Thailand, which is issued at the request of the party. It serves as the basis for enforcement through state mechanisms. Without this document, it is impossible to initiate actions regarding the debtor's assets.
Next, enforcement proceedings are initiated. Their implementation takes place under the control of the bailiffs of Thailand, who have the right to seize property, block accounts, seize assets and take other measures of influence. The petition for enforcement is filed with the court that issued the decision. The participation of a lawyer at this stage remains a mandatory condition, especially if an exact definition of the list of property subject to recovery is required.
Enforcement may be complicated by the actions of the debtor itself. If assets are concealed or cooperation is refused, additional proceedings may be initiated on non-enforcement of the court order. This is a procedurally complex procedure that involves collecting new evidence, including financial statements and property information. Requests to registers, accounting documents and bank statements are often used.
Recognition of foreign decisions
If the award was obtained outside of Thailand, its enforcement requires recognition in the national jurisdiction. Direct enforcement is not possible without going through a special procedure. Thailand does not have a universal mechanism for automatic recognition of foreign judicial decisions. However, foreign arbitration proceedings in Thailand may be recognized by virtue of the country's participation in the New York Convention. In this case, arbitration awards made in other countries may be enforced, subject to the requirements of Thai procedural law.
If it is a foreign state court decision, a separate case for recognition must be initiated. The party must provide certified copies, translations, evidence of proper notification and compliance with the defendant's rights. Only then can an enforcement case be opened and the documents sent to the Thai courts to enforce the collection requirements.
Lawyer's Advice: How to Protect Your Business
Conducting legal proceedings in Thailand often becomes a forced measure. But even before the proceedings begin, the company can take steps that will reduce risks, speed up the procedure and increase the chances of successful dispute resolution in Thailand. Such measures do not require complex decisions, but form the legal stability of the business in a foreign jurisdiction :
- Arbitration in a contract. The first thing that is important to consider is the form of dispute resolution in Thailand. If a contract is concluded with a Thai counterparty, it is reasonable to immediately include a clause on arbitration. This eliminates the need to file a lawsuit and allows the dispute to be considered in a neutral environment. This is especially important for international deliveries, cross-border payments and services. Arbitration in Thailand can be launched faster and more flexibly than a regular court. In addition, arbitration decisions are more easily enforced abroad due to international agreements.
- Checking counterparties. Before concluding a deal, it is important to obtain legally reliable information about a partner. It is necessary to check counterparties through local registries - this is accessible and legal. Registration data, information on legal status, court history and tax claims are available through government databases. Such analysis allows you to identify unscrupulous participants even before initiating a lawsuit in Thailand, and in some cases - to avoid conflict altogether.
- Local legal support. Working with partners in another country requires adaptation to its legal environment. Having a local legal representative is necessary not only at the conflict stage, but also when preparing documents, correspondence and negotiations. The Thai legal system requires formal procedures. Only a licensed lawyer has the right to represent in a Thai court. His participation is not a formality, but a defense tool. He ensures the correctness of all submissions, including filing a statement of claim, timely delivery of the summons and preparation for the preliminary court hearing.
- Documents in Thai. Even if corporate reporting and correspondence are in English, important legal documents should be duplicated. Keeping records in Thai in parallel is a way to prepare in advance for a possible dispute. Such documents are more easily recognized by the court, undergo the legalization procedure more quickly and reduce the burden of presenting evidence in Thailand. In addition, they increase the level of trust on the part of administrative and judicial authorities.
Any business should take into account the risk of a legal dispute. Prepare a strategy before a conflict occurs - this is the key to sustainability. Determine who will be responsible for contacting lawyers, where key documents will be stored, who will be able to promptly open a case in a Thai court or appeal its decision. This model minimizes losses in the event of a dispute. A strategic approach allows you to quickly bring a counterparty to justice in Thailand and not waste time on emergency measures.
Conclusion
A court case in Thailand is not just a formal procedure, but a critical stage on which the outcome of all commercial activities depends. Mistakes in documents, incorrect jurisdiction or improper behavior in the courtroom can ruin the efforts invested in business. Therefore, knowledge of legal procedures, understanding the logic of the judicial system and professional support at every stage - from initiating a claim to executing a court decision - are key factors.
Our team provides comprehensive support for foreign companies in Thailand. We help to open a case in a Thai court, conduct a trial, file an appeal, protect a business through the court or use alternative dispute resolution. Specialists have local practice, work in several languages and are focused on results. Legal assistance is available at all stages: from reviewing contracts to representing interests in the courtroom.
Obtaining a crypto license in Thailand 
Registration of a crypto license in Thailand